Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Devstral Small 1.1 vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Devstral Small 1.1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Devstral Small 1.1
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Devstral Small 1.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureDevstral Small 1.1Mistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyDevstral Small 1.1Mistral Nemo
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2025Jul 2024

Devstral Small 1.1 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Devstral Small 1.1 with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Devstral Small 1.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 12.1, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Devstral Small 1.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Devstral Small 1.1 does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.