Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Stepfun-ai

Ministral 3 3B 2512 vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Ministral 3 3B 2512 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Supports vision

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Ministral 3 3B 2512
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMinistral 3 3B 2512Step 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMinistral 3 3B 2512Step 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIStepfun-ai
ReleasedDec 2025Jan 2026

Ministral 3 3B 2512 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Ministral 3 3B 2512 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Ministral 3 3B 2512 has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Ministral 3 3B 2512 has a 131,072 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Ministral 3 3B 2512 supports vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.