Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Large 2411 vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Large 2411 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Large 2411
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Mistral Large 2411

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Large 2411Mistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Large 2411Mistral Nemo
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedNov 2024Jul 2024

Mistral Large 2411 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Large 2411 with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Large 2411 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.8, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Large 2411 has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Large 2411 does not support vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.