Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3 vs Mistral Nemo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
Mistral Medium 3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3Mistral Nemo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3Mistral Nemo
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedMay 2025Jul 2024

Mistral Medium 3 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3 with:

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 13.6, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Medium 3 has a 131,072 token context window, while Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3 supports vision. Mistral Nemo does not support vision.