Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Xiaomi

Mistral Medium 3 vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Mistral Medium 3
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Mistral Medium 3
Speed
Mistral Medium 3

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMistral AIXiaomi
ReleasedMay 2025Unknown

Mistral Medium 3 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Medium 3 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Mistral Medium 3 has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Mistral Medium 3's score of 13.6.
Mistral Medium 3 has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Mistral Medium 3 supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.