Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Mixtral 8x22B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Mistral Medium 3.1
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Mixtral 8x22B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedAug 2025Apr 2024

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Mixtral 8x22B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Compare Mixtral 8x22B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Mixtral 8x22B Instruct's score of N/A.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Mixtral 8x22B Instruct has a 65,536 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Mixtral 8x22B Instruct does not support vision.