Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Mistral AI
Mistral AI

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Pixtral Large 2411

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Pixtral Large 2411 wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics
Price Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Pixtral Large 2411
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Pixtral Large 2411
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Pixtral Large 2411
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMistral AI
ReleasedAug 2025Nov 2024

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Pixtral Large 2411 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Compare Pixtral Large 2411 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Pixtral Large 2411's score of N/A.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Pixtral Large 2411 has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Pixtral Large 2411 supports vision.