Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Kimi K2.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Context Window
Kimi K2.5
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Kimi K2.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Kimi K2.5
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMoonshotai
ReleasedAug 2025Jan 2026

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.38/M tokens. Kimi K2.5 has cheaper output pricing at $1.72/M tokens.
Kimi K2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.8, compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's score of 18.3.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Kimi K2.5 supports vision.