Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.90 Mistral Medium 3.1
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.90 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.45 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Medium 3.1 is 11% cheaper overall.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
5
Mistral Medium 3.1 Wins
1
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
21.313.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
18.310.8
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
38.311.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
68.369.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
58.846.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.616.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
-54.9-
AIME
Competition math
-24.7-
Mistral Medium 3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Medium 3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Medium 3.1
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/second78.1 tok/s35.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.42s0.51s
Mistral Medium 3.1 responds 120% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMistral AINvidia
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2024

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.