Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.10 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.40 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 78% cheaper overall.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

7
Benchmarks Compared
5
Mistral Medium 3.1 Wins
1
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
21.314.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
18.310.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
38.38.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
68.369.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
58.848.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.629.0
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
Mistral Medium 3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Medium 3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Medium 3.1
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/second78.1 tok/s82.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.42s0.24s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMistral AINvidia
ReleasedAug 2025Oct 2025

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.