Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Nemotron Nano 9B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Context Window
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Speed
Nemotron Nano 9B V2

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$0.04 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.00$0.16 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.10 Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Nemotron Nano 9B V2 is 91% cheaper overall.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Providers

No provider data available

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
3
Mistral Medium 3.1 Wins
3
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
21.313.2
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
18.37.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
38.362.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
68.373.9
GPQA
Graduate-level science
58.855.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.670.1
Mistral Medium 3.1 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Medium 3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Medium 3.1
131,072
tokens
Nemotron Nano 9B V2
131,072
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron Nano 9B V2Winner
Tokens/second78.1 tok/s137.2 tok/s
Time to First Token0.42s0.53s
Nemotron Nano 9B V2 responds 76% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron Nano 9B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1Nemotron Nano 9B V2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorMistral AINvidia
ReleasedAug 2025Sep 2025

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Compare Nemotron Nano 9B V2 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.16/M tokens.
Mistral Medium 3.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 18.3, compared to Nemotron Nano 9B V2's score of 7.5.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 9B V2 has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. Nemotron Nano 9B V2 does not support vision.