Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Mistral Medium 3.1 vs GPT-5.2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Medium 3.1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

GPT-5.2 Pro wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mistral Medium 3.1
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-5.2 Pro
Speed
Mistral Medium 3.1

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral Medium 3.1GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.40$10.50 Mistral Medium 3.1
Output (per 1M tokens)$2.00$84.00 Mistral Medium 3.1
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Medium 3.1 is 97% cheaper overall.

Mistral Medium 3.1 Providers

No provider data available

GPT-5.2 Pro Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

6
Benchmarks Compared
0
Mistral Medium 3.1 Wins
6
GPT-5.2 Pro Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral Medium 3.1GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
21.351.3
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
18.348.7
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
38.399.0
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
68.387.4
GPQA
Graduate-level science
58.890.3
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
40.688.9
GPT-5.2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Medium 3.1
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Medium 3.1
131,072
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro
400,000
tokens
GPT-5.2 Pro has a 67% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricMistral Medium 3.1GPT-5.2 ProWinner
Tokens/second78.1 tok/s65.7 tok/s
Time to First Token0.42s74.76s
Mistral Medium 3.1 responds 19% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Medium 3.1GPT-5.2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Medium 3.1GPT-5.2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMistral AIOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2025Dec 2025

Mistral Medium 3.1 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

GPT-5.2 Pro Modalities

Input
imagetextfile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Medium 3.1 with:

Compare GPT-5.2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Mistral Medium 3.1 has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 48.7, compared to Mistral Medium 3.1's score of 18.3.
Mistral Medium 3.1 has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5.2 Pro has a 400,000 token context window.
Mistral Medium 3.1 supports vision. GPT-5.2 Pro supports vision.