Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Moonshotai
Moonshotai

Mistral Nemo vs Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoKimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoKimi K2 0905 (exacto)
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIMoonshotai
ReleasedJul 2024Sep 2025

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision.