Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Mistral Nemo vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral NemoLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.90 Mistral Nemo
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.90 Mistral Nemo
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.01$0.45 Mistral Nemo
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 97% cheaper overall.

Mistral Nemo Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

9
Benchmarks Compared
1
Mistral Nemo Wins
2
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral NemoLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.013.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.8-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-11.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
26.469.0
GPQA
Graduate-level science
8.746.5
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-16.9-
Aider
Real-world code editing
-54.9-
AIME
Competition math
-24.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
36.1--
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Nemo
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMistral NemoLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructWinner
Tokens/secondN/A35.5 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.51s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AINvidia
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2024

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.8, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.