Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Mistral Nemo vs Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricMistral NemoLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.02$0.10 Mistral Nemo
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.04$0.40 Mistral Nemo
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.01N/A Mistral Nemo
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Mistral Nemo is 86% cheaper overall.

Mistral Nemo Providers

No provider data available

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
1
Mistral Nemo Wins
2
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkMistral NemoLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
25.014.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-10.5-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
-8.0-
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
26.469.2
GPQA
Graduate-level science
8.748.1
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
-29.0-
AIME
Competition math
-13.7-
BBH
Big-Bench Hard
36.1--
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Mistral Nemo
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Mistral Nemo
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens

Speed Performance

MetricMistral NemoLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Winner
Tokens/secondN/A82.7 tok/s
Time to First TokenN/A0.24s

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AINvidia
ReleasedJul 2024Oct 2025

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Nemo with:

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 10.5, compared to Mistral Nemo's score of N/A.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision.