Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
?

Mistral Nemo vs GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Mistral Nemo wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking wins:

  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Benchmark Advantage
Mistral Nemo
Context Window
Mistral Nemo
Speed
N/A

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral NemoGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral NemoGLM 4.1V 9B Thinking
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AI
ReleasedJul 2024Unknown

Mistral Nemo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Nemo has cheaper input pricing at $0.02/M tokens. Mistral Nemo has cheaper output pricing at $0.04/M tokens.
Mistral Nemo has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking has a 32,768 token context window.
Mistral Nemo does not support vision. GLM 4.1V 9B Thinking supports vision.