Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
Stepfun-ai

Mistral Small 3.2 24B vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Mistral Small 3.2 24B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Mistral Small 3.2 24B
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Mistral Small 3.2 24B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureMistral Small 3.2 24BStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyMistral Small 3.2 24BStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMistral AIStepfun-ai
ReleasedJun 2025Jan 2026

Mistral Small 3.2 24B Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Mistral Small 3.2 24B with:

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Mistral Small 3.2 24B has cheaper input pricing at $0.07/M tokens. Mistral Small 3.2 24B has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Mistral Small 3.2 24B's score of 13.3.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B has a 131,072 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Mistral Small 3.2 24B supports vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.