Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Mistral AI
Mistral AI
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Voxtral Small 24B 2507
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureVoxtral Small 24B 2507GPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyVoxtral Small 24B 2507GPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMistral AIOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2025Jan 2026

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 Modalities

Input
textaudio
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 has a 32,000 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Voxtral Small 24B 2507 does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.