Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMoonshotaiNvidia
ReleasedSep 2025Oct 2024

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.88/M tokens.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.9, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision.