Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) vs GPT-5.4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GPT-5.4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.4
Context Window
GPT-5.4
Speed
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0905 (exacto)GPT-5.4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0905 (exacto)GPT-5.4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorMoonshotaiOpenAI
ReleasedSep 2025Mar 2026

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.4 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $2.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.0, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while GPT-5.4 has a 1,050,000 token context window.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision. GPT-5.4 supports vision.