Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Xai
Xai

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

100 out of our 304 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time

Grok 4 wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Benchmark Advantage
Grok 4
Context Window
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Speed
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Grok 4Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.39$3.00 Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.90$15.00 Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$750000.00 Grok 4
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) is 87% cheaper overall.

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Providers

Chutes $0.39 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.40
DeepInfra $0.40
Parasail $0.59
AtlasCloud $0.60

Grok 4 Providers

Vercel $3.00 (Cheapest)
xAI $3.00 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Wins
6
Grok 4 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Grok 4Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
30.841.4
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
25.940.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
57.392.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
81.986.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
76.787.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
61.081.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
-79.6-
AIME
Competition math
-94.3-
Grok 4 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Max output: 262,144 tokens
Grok 4
256,000
tokens
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 2% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Grok 4Winner
Tokens/second51.7 tok/s33.9 tok/s
Time to First Token0.54s8.24s
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) responds 52% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Grok 4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0905 (exacto)Grok 4
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorMoonshotaiXai
ReleasedSep 2025Jul 2025

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Grok 4 Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) with:

Compare Grok 4 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper input pricing at $0.39/M tokens. Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has cheaper output pricing at $1.90/M tokens.
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 40.5, compared to Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)'s score of 25.9.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while Grok 4 has a 256,000 token context window.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision. Grok 4 supports vision.