Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Xiaomi

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) vs MiMo-V2-Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding

MiMo-V2-Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
MiMo-V2-Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto)
Context Window
MiMo-V2-Flash
Speed
MiMo-V2-Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 0905 (exacto)MiMo-V2-Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 0905 (exacto)MiMo-V2-Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiXiaomi
ReleasedSep 2025Dec 2025

Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo-V2-Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. MiMo-V2-Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.29/M tokens.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 25.9, compared to MiMo-V2-Flash's score of 25.8.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window, while MiMo-V2-Flash has a 262,144 token context window.
Kimi K2 0905 (exacto) does not support vision. MiMo-V2-Flash does not support vision.