Key Takeaways
Kimi K2 Thinking wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Larger context window
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 wins:
- Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
Speed
N/A
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Kimi K2 Thinking | Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.47 | $0.85 | Kimi K2 Thinking |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.85 | Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | $0.14 | N/A | Kimi K2 Thinking |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 0% cheaper overall.
Kimi K2 Thinking Providers
No provider data available
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Providers
No provider data available
Context & Performance
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
131,072
tokens
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
32,768
tokens
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 75% larger context window.
Speed Performance
Speed benchmarks not available for these models
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Kimi K2 Thinking | Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Kimi K2 Thinking | Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 |
|---|---|---|
| License | Open Source | Open Source |
| Author | Moonshotai | Sao10k |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Aug 2024 |
Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities
Input
text
Output
text
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Modalities
Input
text
Output
text