Key Takeaways
Kimi K2 Thinking wins:
- No clear advantages in compared metrics
DeepSeek R1T Chimera wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Cheaper output tokens
- Larger context window
Price Advantage
DeepSeek R1T Chimera
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2 Thinking
Context Window
DeepSeek R1T Chimera
Speed
N/A
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Kimi K2 Thinking | DeepSeek R1T Chimera | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.47 | $0.00 | DeepSeek R1T Chimera |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $2.00 | $0.00 | DeepSeek R1T Chimera |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | $0.14 | N/A | Kimi K2 Thinking |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, DeepSeek R1T Chimera is 100% cheaper overall.
Kimi K2 Thinking Providers
No provider data available
DeepSeek R1T Chimera Providers
No provider data available
Context & Performance
Context Window
Kimi K2 Thinking
131,072
tokens
DeepSeek R1T Chimera
163,840
tokens
DeepSeek R1T Chimera has a 20% larger context window.
Speed Performance
Speed benchmarks not available for these models
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Kimi K2 Thinking | DeepSeek R1T Chimera |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Kimi K2 Thinking | DeepSeek R1T Chimera |
|---|---|---|
| License | Open Source | Open Source |
| Author | Moonshotai | Tngtech |
| Released | Nov 2025 | Unknown |
Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities
Input
text
Output
text
DeepSeek R1T Chimera Modalities
Input
Output