Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Z-ai

Kimi K2 Thinking vs GLM 4.6

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2 Thinking wins:

  • No clear advantages in compared metrics

GLM 4.6 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GLM 4.6
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 4.6
Context Window
GLM 4.6
Speed
GLM 4.6

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2 ThinkingGLM 4.6
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2 ThinkingGLM 4.6
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiZ-ai
ReleasedNov 2025Sep 2025

Kimi K2 Thinking Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 4.6 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Kimi K2 Thinking with:

Compare GLM 4.6 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GLM 4.6 has cheaper input pricing at $0.39/M tokens. GLM 4.6 has cheaper output pricing at $1.70/M tokens.
GLM 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 30.2, compared to Kimi K2 Thinking's score of N/A.
Kimi K2 Thinking has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM 4.6 has a 204,800 token context window.
Kimi K2 Thinking does not support vision. GLM 4.6 does not support vision.