Key Takeaways
Kimi K2.5 Turbo wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
MiMo v2 Pro wins:
- Faster response time
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Better at coding
Price Advantage
Kimi K2.5 Turbo
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
MiMo v2 Pro
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | Kimi K2.5 Turbo | MiMo v2 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $0.60 | $1.00 | Kimi K2.5 Turbo |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $3.00 | $3.00 | Tie |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | N/A | $0.20 | MiMo v2 Pro |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Kimi K2.5 Turbo is 20% cheaper overall.
Kimi K2.5 Turbo Providers
No provider data available
MiMo v2 Pro Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
3
Benchmarks Compared
0
Kimi K2.5 Turbo Wins
0
MiMo v2 Pro Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | Kimi K2.5 Turbo | MiMo v2 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | - | 49.2 | - |
Coding Index Code generation & understanding | - | 41.4 | - |
GPQA Graduate-level science | - | 87.0 | - |
MiMo v2 Pro significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
Kimi K2.5 Turbo
N/A
tokens
MiMo v2 Pro
N/A
tokens
Speed Performance
| Metric | Kimi K2.5 Turbo | MiMo v2 Pro | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens/second | N/A | 0.0 tok/s | |
| Time to First Token | N/A | 0.00s |
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Kimi K2.5 Turbo | MiMo v2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | Kimi K2.5 Turbo | MiMo v2 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Author | Moonshotai | Xiaomi |
Kimi K2.5 Turbo Modalities
Input
Output
MiMo v2 Pro Modalities
Input
Output