Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Moonshotai
Moonshotai
vs
Sao10k

Kimi K2.5 vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Kimi K2.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Benchmark Advantage
Kimi K2.5
Context Window
Kimi K2.5
Speed
Kimi K2.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureKimi K2.5Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyKimi K2.5Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorMoonshotaiSao10k
ReleasedJan 2026Aug 2024

Kimi K2.5 Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Kimi K2.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.38/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.85/M tokens.
Kimi K2.5 has a 262,144 token context window, while Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has a 32,768 token context window.
Kimi K2.5 supports vision. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 does not support vision.