Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Neversleep
vs
Stepfun-ai

Lumimaid v0.2 8B vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Lumimaid v0.2 8B wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Lumimaid v0.2 8B
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLumimaid v0.2 8BStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLumimaid v0.2 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNeversleepStepfun-ai
ReleasedSep 2024Jan 2026

Lumimaid v0.2 8B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Lumimaid v0.2 8B with:

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Lumimaid v0.2 8B has cheaper input pricing at $0.09/M tokens. Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Lumimaid v0.2 8B's score of N/A.
Lumimaid v0.2 8B has a 32,768 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Lumimaid v0.2 8B does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.