Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nousresearch
Nousresearch
vs
Stepfun-ai

Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureHermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8BStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyHermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8BStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNousresearchStepfun-ai
ReleasedMay 2024Jan 2026

Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B with:

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B has cheaper output pricing at $0.14/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B's score of N/A.
Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B has a 8,192 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Hermes 2 Pro - Llama-3 8B does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.