Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Nvidia
Nvidia

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Nemotron Nano 12B V2

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math

Nemotron Nano 12B V2 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
Price Advantage
Nemotron Nano 12B V2
Benchmark Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNemotron Nano 12B V2
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructNemotron Nano 12B V2
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaNvidia
ReleasedOct 2024Unknown

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Nemotron Nano 12B V2 Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron Nano 12B V2 has cheaper input pricing at $0.20/M tokens. Nemotron Nano 12B V2 has cheaper output pricing at $0.20/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Nemotron Nano 12B V2 has a 128,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision. Nemotron Nano 12B V2 does not support vision.