Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs GPT-5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Best LLMs for OpenClaw Vote for which model works best with OpenClaw

112 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in February.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5
Context Window
GPT-5
Speed
GPT-5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGPT-5Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$1.20$1.25 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$1.20$10.00 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$125000.00 GPT-5
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 65% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

DeepInfra $1.20 (Cheapest)

GPT-5 Providers

OpenAI $1.25 (Cheapest)
Azure $1.25 (Cheapest)

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins
8
GPT-5 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGPT-5Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.444.6
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.836.0
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
11.094.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
69.087.1
GPQA
Graduate-level science
46.585.4
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
16.984.6
Aider
Real-world code editing
54.988.0
AIME
Competition math
24.795.7
GPT-5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
GPT-5
400,000
tokens
Max output: 128,000 tokens
GPT-5 has a 67% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGPT-5Winner
Tokens/second31.3 tok/s83.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.37s109.19s
GPT-5 responds 166% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGPT-5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGPT-5
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorNvidiaOpenAI
ReleasedOct 2024Aug 2025

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Compare GPT-5 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $1.20/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $1.20/M tokens.
GPT-5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.0, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GPT-5 has a 400,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision. GPT-5 supports vision.