Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Xai
Xai

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

Grok 4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
Grok 4
Context Window
Grok 4
Speed
Grok 4

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGrok 4Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.90$3.00 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.90$15.00 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.45$0.75 Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is 85% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Providers

No provider data available

Grok 4 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Wins
8
Grok 4 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGrok 4Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
13.441.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.840.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
11.092.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
69.086.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
46.587.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
16.981.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
54.979.6
AIME
Competition math
24.794.3
Grok 4 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
131,072
tokens
Grok 4
256,000
tokens
Grok 4 has a 49% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGrok 4Winner
Tokens/second35.5 tok/s48.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.51s10.29s
Grok 4 responds 35% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGrok 4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGrok 4
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorNvidiaXai
ReleasedOct 2024Jul 2025

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Grok 4 Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct with:

Compare Grok 4 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.90/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.90/M tokens.
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 40.5, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while Grok 4 has a 256,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision. Grok 4 supports vision.