Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructMiMo v2 Omni
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorNvidiaXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2024Mar 2026

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Omni has cheaper input pricing at $0.40/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.88/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.