Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct vs GLM-5V Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM-5V Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5V Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5V Turbo
Speed
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGLM-5V Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70B InstructGLM-5V Turbo
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorNvidiaZ-ai
ReleasedOct 2024Apr 2026

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM-5V Turbo Modalities

Input
imagetextvideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper input pricing at $0.88/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has cheaper output pricing at $0.88/M tokens.
GLM-5V Turbo scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 36.2, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's score of 10.8.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM-5V Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct does not support vision. GLM-5V Turbo supports vision.