Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs GPT-5.1-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.1-Codex wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.1-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.1-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.1-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1GPT-5.1-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1GPT-5.1-Codex
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorNvidiaOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownNov 2025

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.1-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.60/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper output pricing at $1.80/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5.1-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not support vision. GPT-5.1-Codex supports vision.