Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs GPT-5.4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

GPT-5.4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.4
Context Window
GPT-5.4
Speed
GPT-5.4

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1GPT-5.4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1GPT-5.4
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorNvidiaOpenAI
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

GPT-5.4 Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.60/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper output pricing at $1.80/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 128,000 token context window, while GPT-5.4 has a 1,050,000 token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not support vision. GPT-5.4 supports vision.