Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorNvidiaXiaomi

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.60/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper output pricing at $1.80/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1's score of N/A.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 128,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.