Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 vs GLM-5 Turbo

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Has reasoning mode

GLM-5 Turbo wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Benchmark Advantage
GLM-5 Turbo
Context Window
GLM-5 Turbo
Speed
GLM-5 Turbo

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1GLM-5 Turbo
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1GLM-5 Turbo
LicenseOpen SourceProprietary
AuthorNvidiaZ-ai
ReleasedUnknownMar 2026

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 Modalities

Input
Output

GLM-5 Turbo Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper input pricing at $0.60/M tokens. Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has cheaper output pricing at $1.80/M tokens.
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 has a 128,000 token context window, while GLM-5 Turbo has a 202,752 token context window.