Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Xai
Xai

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs Grok 4

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

108 out of our 483 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time

Grok 4 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
Grok 4
Context Window
Grok 4
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Grok 4Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.10$3.00 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.40$15.00 Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Cache Read (per 1M)N/A$0.75 Grok 4
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 is 97% cheaper overall.

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Providers

No provider data available

Grok 4 Providers

No provider data available

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Wins
7
Grok 4 Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Grok 4Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
14.641.5
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
10.540.5
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
8.092.7
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
69.286.6
GPQA
Graduate-level science
48.187.7
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
29.081.9
Aider
Real-world code editing
-79.6-
AIME
Competition math
13.794.3
Grok 4 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
131,072
tokens
Grok 4
256,000
tokens
Grok 4 has a 49% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Grok 4Winner
Tokens/second82.7 tok/s48.1 tok/s
Time to First Token0.24s10.29s
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 responds 72% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Grok 4
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5Grok 4
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorNvidiaXai
ReleasedOct 2025Jul 2025

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Grok 4 Modalities

Input
imagetext
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 with:

Compare Grok 4 with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
Grok 4 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 40.5, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window, while Grok 4 has a 256,000 token context window.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision. Grok 4 supports vision.