Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs MiMo v2 Omni

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode

MiMo v2 Omni wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Omni
Context Window
MiMo v2 Omni
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5MiMo v2 Omni
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5MiMo v2 Omni
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorNvidiaXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Mar 2026

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Omni Modalities

Input
textaudioimagevideo
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 35.5, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window, while MiMo v2 Omni has a 262,144 token context window.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision. MiMo v2 Omni supports vision.