Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Xiaomi

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5MiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5MiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorNvidiaXiaomi
ReleasedOct 2025Unknown

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.