Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Z-ai

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 vs GLM 5

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Better at math

GLM 5 wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5GLM 5
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyLlama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5GLM 5
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaZ-ai
ReleasedOct 2025Feb 2026

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GLM 5 Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has cheaper output pricing at $0.40/M tokens.
GLM 5 scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 39.0, compared to Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5's score of 10.5.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 has a 131,072 token context window, while GLM 5 has a 202,752 token context window.
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B V1.5 does not support vision. GLM 5 does not support vision.