Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs GPT-OSS-120b

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Join the Price Per Token Community

Key Takeaways

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Better at coding

GPT-OSS-120b wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at math
  • Supports vision
Price Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-OSS-120b
Context Window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Speed
GPT-OSS-120b

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGPT-OSS-120b
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BGPT-OSS-120b
LicenseOpen SourceOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaOpenAI
ReleasedDec 2025Aug 2025

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-OSS-120b Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper input pricing at $0.04/M tokens. GPT-OSS-120b has cheaper output pricing at $0.10/M tokens.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 15.8, compared to GPT-OSS-120b's score of 15.5.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a 262,144 token context window, while GPT-OSS-120b has a 131,072 token context window.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B does not support vision. GPT-OSS-120b supports vision.