Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
Nvidia
Nvidia
vs
Stepfun-ai

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B wins:

  • Faster response time

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls
Price Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyNemotron-3 Super 120B A12BStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorNvidiaStepfun-ai
ReleasedUnknownJan 2026

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B Modalities

Input
Output

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B with:

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B's score of 31.2.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B has a unknown token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
Nemotron-3 Super 120B A12B does not support vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.