Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Xiaomi

Codex Mini vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

Codex Mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
Codex Mini
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
Codex Mini
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureCodex MiniMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyCodex MiniMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIXiaomi

Codex Mini Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare Codex Mini with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Codex Mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.75/M tokens. Codex Mini has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to Codex Mini's score of N/A.
Codex Mini has a 200,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
Codex Mini supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.