Key Takeaways
curie wins:
- Cheaper output tokens
GLM 5 wins:
- Cheaper input tokens
- Larger context window
- Faster response time
- Higher intelligence benchmark
- Better at coding
Price Advantage
curie
Benchmark Advantage
GLM 5
Context Window
GLM 5
Speed
GLM 5
Pricing Comparison
Price Comparison
| Metric | curie | GLM 5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Input (per 1M tokens) | $1.00 | $0.80 | GLM 5 |
| Output (per 1M tokens) | $1.00 | $2.55 | curie |
| Cache Read (per 1M) | N/A | $0.16 | GLM 5 |
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, curie is 19% cheaper overall.
curie Providers
No provider data available
GLM 5 Providers
No provider data available
Benchmark Comparison
3
Benchmarks Compared
0
curie Wins
0
GLM 5 Wins
Benchmark Scores
| Benchmark | curie | GLM 5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
Intelligence Index Overall intelligence score | - | 40.6 | - |
Coding Index Code generation & understanding | - | 39.0 | - |
GPQA Graduate-level science | - | 66.6 | - |
GLM 5 significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.
Cost vs Quality
X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
Other models
Context & Performance
Context Window
curie
N/A
tokens
GLM 5
202,752
tokens
Speed Performance
| Metric | curie | GLM 5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tokens/second | N/A | 47.5 tok/s | |
| Time to First Token | N/A | 1.20s |
Capabilities
Feature Comparison
| Feature | curie | GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Vision (Image Input) | ||
| Tool/Function Calls | ||
| Reasoning Mode | ||
| Audio Input | ||
| Audio Output | ||
| PDF Input | ||
| Prompt Caching | ||
| Web Search |
License & Release
| Property | curie | GLM 5 |
|---|---|---|
| License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Author | OpenAI | Z-ai |
| Released | Unknown | Feb 2026 |
curie Modalities
Input
Output
GLM 5 Modalities
Input
text
Output
text