Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
OpenAI
OpenAI

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k vs GPT-5.2-Codex

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k wins:

  • Cheaper output tokens

GPT-5.2-Codex wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Supports vision
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k
Benchmark Advantage
GPT-5.2-Codex
Context Window
GPT-5.2-Codex
Speed
GPT-5.2-Codex

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kGPT-5.2-Codex
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-3.5 Turbo 16kGPT-5.2-Codex
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIOpenAI
ReleasedAug 2023Jan 2026

GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

GPT-5.2-Codex Modalities

Input
textimage
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k with:

Compare GPT-5.2-Codex with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-5.2-Codex has cheaper input pricing at $1.75/M tokens. GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has cheaper output pricing at $4.00/M tokens.
GPT-5.2-Codex scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 43.0, compared to GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k's score of N/A.
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k has a 16,385 token context window, while GPT-5.2-Codex has a 400,000 token context window.
GPT-3.5 Turbo 16k does not support vision. GPT-5.2-Codex supports vision.