Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Qwen
Qwen

GPT-4o-mini vs Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

92 out of our 301 tracked models have had a price change in March.

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

Key Takeaways

GPT-4o-mini wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Supports vision

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Better at math
Price Advantage
GPT-4o-mini
Benchmark Advantage
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Context Window
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Speed
GPT-4o-mini

Pricing Comparison

Price Comparison

MetricGPT-4o-miniQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Input (per 1M tokens)$0.15$0.22 GPT-4o-mini
Output (per 1M tokens)$0.60$1.00 GPT-4o-mini
Cache Read (per 1M)$0.07$0.02 Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Using a 3:1 input/output ratio, GPT-4o-mini is 37% cheaper overall.

GPT-4o-mini Providers

OpenAI $0.15 (Cheapest)
Vercel $0.15 (Cheapest)
Azure $0.15 (Cheapest)

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Providers

Google $0.22 (Cheapest)
SiliconFlow $0.25
Novita $0.30
Vercel $0.40
Nebius $0.40

Benchmark Comparison

8
Benchmarks Compared
0
GPT-4o-mini Wins
6
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Wins

Benchmark Scores

BenchmarkGPT-4o-miniQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Intelligence Index
Overall intelligence score
12.624.8
Coding Index
Code generation & understanding
-24.6-
Math Index
Mathematical reasoning
14.739.3
MMLU Pro
Academic knowledge
64.878.8
GPQA
Graduate-level science
42.661.8
LiveCodeBench
Competitive programming
23.458.5
Aider
Real-world code editing
55.6--
AIME
Competition math
11.747.7
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) significantly outperforms in coding benchmarks.

Cost vs Quality

X-axis:
Y-axis:
Loading chart...
GPT-4o-mini
Other models

Context & Performance

Context Window

GPT-4o-mini
128,000
tokens
Max output: 16,384 tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
262,144
tokens
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 51% larger context window.

Speed Performance

MetricGPT-4o-miniQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Tokens/second58.0 tok/s47.5 tok/s
Time to First Token0.54s1.64s
GPT-4o-mini responds 22% faster on average.

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4o-miniQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-4o-miniQwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIQwen
ReleasedJul 2024Jul 2025

GPT-4o-mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-4o-mini with:

Compare Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with:

Frequently Asked Questions

GPT-4o-mini has cheaper input pricing at $0.15/M tokens. GPT-4o-mini has cheaper output pricing at $0.60/M tokens.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 24.6, compared to GPT-4o-mini's score of N/A.
GPT-4o-mini has a 128,000 token context window, while Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) has a 262,144 token context window.
GPT-4o-mini supports vision. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) does not support vision.