Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Stepfun-ai

GPT-4o-mini vs Step 3.5 Flash

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-4o-mini wins:

  • Better at math
  • Supports vision

Step 3.5 Flash wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Larger context window
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
  • Has reasoning mode
Price Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Benchmark Advantage
Step 3.5 Flash
Context Window
Step 3.5 Flash
Speed
Step 3.5 Flash

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4o-miniStep 3.5 Flash
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-4o-miniStep 3.5 Flash
LicenseProprietaryOpen Source
AuthorOpenAIStepfun-ai
ReleasedJul 2024Jan 2026

GPT-4o-mini Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

Step 3.5 Flash Modalities

Input
text
Output
text

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-4o-mini with:

Compare Step 3.5 Flash with:

Frequently Asked Questions

Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper input pricing at $0.10/M tokens. Step 3.5 Flash has cheaper output pricing at $0.30/M tokens.
Step 3.5 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 31.6, compared to GPT-4o-mini's score of N/A.
GPT-4o-mini has a 128,000 token context window, while Step 3.5 Flash has a 256,000 token context window.
GPT-4o-mini supports vision. Step 3.5 Flash does not support vision.