Price Per TokenPrice Per Token
OpenAI
OpenAI
vs
Xiaomi

GPT-4o vs MiMo v2 Pro

A detailed comparison of pricing, benchmarks, and capabilities

Get our weekly newsletter on pricing changes, new releases, and tools.

OpenClaw

Deploy OpenClaw in Under 1 Minute We handle hosting, scaling, and maintenance

Key Takeaways

GPT-4o wins:

  • Larger context window
  • Supports vision
  • Supports tool calls

MiMo v2 Pro wins:

  • Cheaper input tokens
  • Cheaper output tokens
  • Faster response time
  • Higher intelligence benchmark
  • Better at coding
Price Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Benchmark Advantage
MiMo v2 Pro
Context Window
GPT-4o
Speed
MiMo v2 Pro

Pricing Comparison

Benchmark Comparison

Context & Performance

Capabilities

Feature Comparison

FeatureGPT-4oMiMo v2 Pro
Vision (Image Input)
Tool/Function Calls
Reasoning Mode
Audio Input
Audio Output
PDF Input
Prompt Caching
Web Search

License & Release

PropertyGPT-4oMiMo v2 Pro
LicenseProprietaryProprietary
AuthorOpenAIXiaomi
ReleasedMay 2024Unknown

GPT-4o Modalities

Input
textimagefile
Output
text

MiMo v2 Pro Modalities

Input
Output

Related Comparisons

Compare GPT-4o with:

Compare MiMo v2 Pro with:

Frequently Asked Questions

MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper input pricing at $1.00/M tokens. MiMo v2 Pro has cheaper output pricing at $3.00/M tokens.
MiMo v2 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks with a score of 41.4, compared to GPT-4o's score of N/A.
GPT-4o has a 128,000 token context window, while MiMo v2 Pro has a unknown token context window.
GPT-4o supports vision. MiMo v2 Pro does not support vision.